Chapter 8—

“My True Country”:

Longing in The Last Battle

 

            If The Magician’s Nephew responds to the human hunger to know the beginning of things, The Last Battle fulfills the need for knowledge about the end. Northrop Frye describes the last of his four phases as the “darkness, winter and dissolution phase. Myths of the triumphs of these powers; myths of floods and the return of chaos, of the defeat of the hero” (Fables of Identity, p. 16). This describes well the pattern Lewis found best suited to his account of the dissolution and destruction of the Narnian society and world. But for Lewis, as a Christian, dissolution is not the end and The Last Battle concludes in the second phase, “the zenith, summer, and . . . triumph phase. Myths . . . of entering into Paradise” (Fables of Identity, p. 16). The Last Battle moves, then, from the mode of irony, or “antiromance,” the essence of human anxiety dreams, to romance, which pictures idealized human experience and complete happiness. Out of a tone of fear, it creates and builds a tone of longing, which, though strongest at the end of the book, is present throughout and becomes the unifying quality of the story.

            The sense of frustration that dominates the first half of The Last Battle grows out of the first striking image in [ß p. 115] the book. When Puzzle the Donkey is induced by Shift the Ape to plunge into Caldron Pool and retrieve the yellow thing that just came over the waterfall, the description of Puzzle’s struggle becomes a symbol of the story that is to follow:

 

A great mass of foam got him in the face and filled his mouth with water and blinded him. Then he went under altogether for a few seconds, and when he came up again he was in quite another part of the Pool. Then the swirl caught him and carried him round and round and faster and faster till it took him right under the waterfall itself, and the force of the water plunged him down, deep down, so that he thought he would never be able to hold his breath till he came up again. (pp. 4-5)      

 

The land of Narnia, as Shift proceeds to betray it to Calormen and to undercut its belief in Aslan and in itself, is similarly caught in maelstrom. It struggles—behind the hasty and misguided efforts of King Tirian and Jewel the Unicorn, then with the help of the children Jill and Eustace, and finally through arguing against error and fighting it in battle—to get free of the current that is pulling it down. Again and again a feeling of optimism carries Narnia to the surface, but it is plunged down each time and eventually, at the end of the battle, it, unlike Puzzle, is submerged for good.

            The setting in the early part of the story creates a foreboding, even despairing tone, and, by contrast, a deep sense of longing for Narnia. Tirian is first encountered, for example, at a little hunting lodge “where he often stayed for ten days or so in the pleasant spring weather” (p. 12). It is there that he hears the “wonderful news” that Aslan has come to Narnia again (p. 13). As Jill and Eustace walk with Tirian, after being brought to Narnia in answer to his cry for help and freeing him from the Calormenes, “the sun had risen, dewdrops were twinkling on every branch, and birds were singing” (p. 47). Later, when the King with his now larger group of followers sets out toward Cair Paravel [ß p. 116] to organize the army and attack the invaders in a unified way, it was “the first really warm day of that spring. The young leaves seemed to be much further out than yesterday: the snowdrops were over, but they saw several primroses. The sunlight slanted through the trees, birds sang, and always (though usually out of sight) there was the noise of running water” (p. 87). Such details, on the one hand, intensify the love of and desire for Narnia: “The children felt, ‘This is really Narnia at last’” (p. 87) and Jill thinks, “Wouldn’t it be lovely if Narnia just went on and on—like what you said it has been?” (p. 89). And, on the other hand, they instill a false sense of optimism, even in Tirian, whose “heart grew lighter as he walked ahead of them, humming an old Narnian marching song” (p. 87).

            But constantly there are reminders that the optimism is false hope and that Narnia will not go on and on. The opening words of the book are “in the last days of Narnia” (p. 1) and the first reference to Tirian describes him as “the last of the Kings of Narnia” (p. 12). The foreboding tone continues when Roonwit the Centaur reports that he finds, as he studies the stars, “terrible things written in the skies” (p. 15). Shortly thereafter, when Tirian and Jewel go alone and in haste to stop the murder of the trees, Tirian feels “horrible thoughts aris[ing] in my heart” and the narrator comments that “much evil came of their rashness” (p. 20). And as the children and Tirian walk through the woods on their way to Stable Hill, the silence all around them conveys the mood of the whole country: “Gloom and fear reigned over Narnia” (p. 59). Nowhere is the effect of the contrasting tones, of optimism and fear, of hope and doom, more striking than at the end of the scene of beauty and lifted spirits described above. Immediately after Tirian felt his heart grow lighter and Jill expressed her hope that Narnia would go on and on, Jewel cautions that “all worlds draw to an end; except Aslan’s own country” (p. 89) and Farsight the eagle arrives to report that Cair Paravel has [ß p. 117] been captured and Roonwit their messenger has been killed. There will be no help and there is no more reason for hope: as the King says after a long silence, “Narnia is no more” (p. 91). The springtime setting and the beauty of the countryside have increased the children’s desires for Narnia, in order to intensify by contrast their growing despair at its approaching defeat.

            A fourth-phase narrative, a story of defeat and dissolution, according to Frye, employs the mode of irony, or antiromance. It is striking, therefore, that The Last Battle is the only one of the Chronicles to use irony. From its opening scene, it requires that a reader discern the discrepancy between reality and appearance. As Shift explains why Puzzle, rather than Shift, should plunge into the pool for the lion skin, the expressed reasons are definitely not the real ones: “‘Wanting me to go into the water,’ said the Ape. ‘As if you didn’t know perfectly well what weak chests Apes always have and how easily they catch cold! Very well. I will go in. I’m feeling cold enough already in this cruel wind. But I’ll go in. I shall probably die. Then you’ll be sorry’” (p. 4). That tone appears again and again early in the book, as for example when Shift asks Puzzle to try on the coat he has fashioned out of the lion skin while Puzzle was trudging to Chippingford for oranges and bananas: “‘You are unkind, Puzzle,’ said Shift. ‘If you’re tired, what do you think I am? All day long, while you’ve been having a lovely refreshing walk down the valley, I’ve been working hard to make you a coat. My paws are so tired I can hardly hold these scissors. And now you won’t say thank-you—and you won’t even look at the coat—and you don’t care—and—and—’” (pp. 8-9). Establishment of such discrepancies, between what words or actions seem to be and what they really are, is verbal irony. It is not very sophisticated irony—a child has no trouble seeing through the deception. But that is just the point, for the [ß p. 118] irony becomes a key indicator that the Ape and his side are not to be trusted.

            Such verbal ironies reappear in the fourth chapter as the Ape informs the Narnians about conditions under the new regime, and they grow into a vein of satire on political and religious tendencies in Lewis’s day. The Ape, in the passage toughing on politics, tells the other animals to get ideas of freedom out of their heads. “Everybody who can work is going to be made to work in the future. Aslan has it all settled with the King of Calormen. . . . All you horses and bulls and donkeys are to be sent down into Calormen to work for your living—pulling and carrying the way horses and such do in other countries. And all you digging animals like moles and rabbits and Dwarfs are going down to work in the Tisroc’s mines” (p. 29). But this, he assures them, will not be slavery: “You’ll be paid—very good wages too. That is to say, your pay will be paid into Aslan’s treasury and he will use it all for everybody’s good. . . . It’s all arranged. And all for your own good. We’ll be able, with the money you earn, to make Narnia a country worth living in. There’ll be oranges and bananas pouring in—and roads and big cities and schools and offices and whips and muzzles and saddles and cages and kennels and prisons—Oh, everything” (p. 30). The lines almost surely reflect Lewis’s concern over the increasing tendency, in our day, toward collectivism and oligarchy. He wrote in 1958, “The modern State exists not to protect our rights but to do us good or make us good—anyway, to do something to us or make us something. Hence the new name ‘leaders’ for those who were once ‘rulers.’ We are less their subjects than their wards, pupils, or domestic animals. There is nothing left of which we can say to them, ‘Mind your own business.’ Our whole lives are their business.”1 This tendency has come at the same time as a loss of personal freedom: “Two wars necessitated vast curtailments of liberty, and we have grown, though grumblingly, accustomed to our chains. The [ß p. 119] increasing complexity and precariousness of our economic life have forced Government to take over many spheres of activity once left to choice or chance.”2 To point towards the dangers in that trend Lewis has the Ape say, in reply to the Bear’s assertion that “we want to be free,” “What do you know about freedom? You think freedom means doing what you like. Well, you’re wrong. That isn’t true freedom. True freedom means doing what I tell you” (pp. 30-31).

            The religious equivalent to this political tyranny is the Ape’s insidious attack on belief in Aslan. It begins with the argument that everyone actually believes in the same thing: “Tash is only another name for Aslan. All that old idea of us being right and the Calormenes wrong is silly. We know better now. The Calormenes use different words but we all mean the same thing. Tash and Aslan are only two different names for you know Who” (p. 31). In forming that argument, the Ape twists Puzzle’s reverent, awe-filled reference to “you know Who” (p. 6) into an irreverent, meaningless generality. This sort of thing becomes the Narnian version of the liberal accommodation and whittling down of the truth of the Gospel that Lewis complained about in our world: “I have some definite views about the de-Christianizing of the church,” he commented in an interview in 1963. “I believe that there are many accommodating preachers, and too many practitioners in the church who are not believers. Jesus Christ did not say ‘Go into all the world and tell the world that it is quite right.’ The Gospel is something completely different. In fact, it is directly opposed to the world.”3 From accommodation of liberal ideas it is an easy step, or slip, to rejection of the fundamental ideas of the faith: Lewis often heard, from churchmen in his day, doctrine which was “so ‘broad’ or ‘liberal’ or ‘modern’ that it in fact excludes any real Supernaturalism and thus ceases to be Christian at all.”4 The Narnian world experienced a somewhat similar situation, as a conversation between Ginger the Cat and [ß p. 120] Rishda Tarkhaan, the Calormene commander, illustrates: “‘I just wanted to know exactly what we both meant today about Aslan meaning no more that Tash.’ ‘Doubtless, most sagacious of cats,’ says the other, ‘you have perceived my meaning.’ ‘You mean,’ says Ginger, ‘that there’s no such person as either.’ ‘All who are enlightened know that,’ said the Tarkaan” (p. 79).

            The attack on Narnia by her enemies is so effective, so devastating, because it undermines the principles and values on which Narnia was founded. Aslan intended Narnia to be free and he reminded King Frank that the animals he would rule over “are not slaves like the dumb beasts of the world you were born in but Talking Beasts and free subjects” (The Magician’s Nephew, p. 139). And at the creation of Narnia Aslan said to the animals, “I give you myself” (The Magician’s Nephew, p. 118). He is not a tame lion, but when Digory asked Aslan to cure his mother, “great shining tears stood in the Lion’s eyes . . . [and Digory] felt as if the Lion must really be sorrier about his Mother than he was himself” (The Magician’s Nephew, p. 142). Narnia was intended, then, to be a “kindly land” (The Magician’s Nephew, p. 175), a land of obedience, love, and freedom. To see these values undermined is almost as hard as to see the nation itself fall. And the use of the ironic mode to depict the undermining is effective because irony and satire remind the reader of normal, positive values as they poke fun at and criticize departures from those values.

            Despite the coming of the children in response to Tirian’s prayer-like call, “Aslan! Aslan! Aslan! Come and help us Now” (p. 41), the situation in Narnia continues to decline. Narnia continues to be endangered by those from without who “care neither for Tash nor Aslan but have only an eye to their own profit” (p. 79) and by those from within who begin accepting the same premise: “We’re on our own now. . . . The Dwarfs are for the Dwarfs” (p. 73). [ß p. 121] The extent of the Ape’s commitment to those values becomes clear only after the faithful few learn of the attack on Cair Paravel: “We see that the Ape’s plans were laid deeper than we dreamed,” Jewel comments. “Doubtless he has been long in secret traffic with the Tisroc, and as soon as he has found the lionskin, he sent him word to make ready his navy for the taking of Cair Paravel and all Narnia. Nothing now remains for us seven but to go back to Stable Hill, proclaim the truth, and take the adventure that Aslan sends us.” Brave as Jewel’s words are, the situation as a whole appears hopeless: “If, by a great marvel, we defeat those thirty Calormenes who are with the Ape, [we must] turn again and die in battle with the far greater host of them that will soon march from Cair Paravel” (pp. 92-93).               

            The despairing tone in The Last Battle is supported by imagery of darkness, death, and dissolution, all characteristic of the ironic mode. Shift figures, for example, that someone who saw Puzzle in his lion skin “just might mistake him for a lion, if he didn’t come too close, and if the light was not too good” (p. 9). The false Aslan, partly for that reason, is shown only at night, at “dreadful midnight meetings” (p. 78), and consultations between the enemy generally are held at times and places that are “black as pitch” (p. 78). In keeping with the long tradition of romances the evil characters are dark, “our dark-faced friends, the Calormenes,” as the Ape calls them (p. 29). When the evil god Tash passes through Narnia, it is as if a previously sunny day was “clouding over” (p. 79). The last battle is fought at night, with firelight outlining objects, and the inside of the stable, especially to the dwarfs, is “pitch-black” (p. 144). All of the darkness and blackness creates and atmosphere of doubt and dread and reinforces the despair which was already growing out of early events.

            Death is first mentioned in The Last Battle as the seven loyal Narnians are on their way toward Stable Hill and [ß p. 122] Eustace wonders, “What’ll happen if we get killed here?” Will they still be alive in England, or will they vanish and never be heard of any more? Jill begins to reply, stops, then begins again:

 

            “I was going to say I wished we’d never come. But I don’t, I don’t, I don’t. Even if we are killed. I’d rather be killed fighting for Narnia than grow old and stupid at home and perhaps go about in a bathchair and then die in the end just the same.”

            “Or be smashed up by British Railways!”

            “Why’d you say that?”

            “Well when that awful jerk came—the one that seemed to throw us into Narnia—I thought it was the beginning of a railway accident. So I was jolly glad to find ourselves here instead.” (pp. 96-97)

           

Later the children discover that there was indeed a railway accident, in which the other friends of Narnia and the Pevensie children’s parents were killed. Lewis resolves the dilemma about the effect of death in one world on the other world by setting up a death situation in both: Jill and Eustace are drawn into Narnia in the split second before their deaths in our world and that, because of the different time sequences, makes it possible for them to die simultaneously in both worlds.

            There have been deaths, of course, in earlier Chronicles: they are inevitable in the romance tradition, with its adventures and battles, and can be viewed as something children should be introduced to as a natural part of life. At the conclusion of The Silver Chair Lewis made a special effort to take the fearfulness out of death by depicting it as a transition to a new and more glorious existence. But death in the earlier books has involved characters with whom the readers are not closely identified, at least not at the time of their deaths. In The Last Battle, however, the characters facing imminent death are Jill and Eustace, with whom readers have identified in earlier books as well [ß p. 123] as this one, and Tirian, the character from whose viewpoint most of this story is being related. To bring death so close without imposing an impossible emotional burden on young readers required most careful handling. Lewis solved the problem by use of the stable door.

            The stable door becomes, throughout the battle, a symbol of death. Lewis can achieve the authenticity of having his characters die in a losing battle, without the naturalistic detail unnecessary in a fairy tale, by having his characters pass through the stable door into eternity. The Calormene leader, Rishda Tarkaan, orders that the Narnians be offered as a sacrifice to Tash: “Take all of them alive if you can and hurl them into the Stable: or drive them into it. When they are all in we will put fire to it and make them an offering to the great god Tash” (p. 117). Though the offerings are to be live offerings, the symbolism of death is clear. As Poggin the Dwarf looks at the stable, he remarks, “I feel in my bones . . . that we shall all, one by one, pass through that dark door before morning” and Tirian replies, “It is indeed a grim door” (p. 128). When the children have passed through it they meet the others who died in the train crash: Professor Kirke, Aunt Polly, Peter, Edmund, and Lucy. Death and the door are, in effect and meaning, the same. The important thing is that neither represents an end but a beginning, not an exit but an entrance.

            After death comes the final stage of a fourth-phase narrative, dissolution. After the battle, Aslan appears and summons Father Time, who, as it was foretold in an earlier story, “would wake on the day the world ended” and henceforth have a new name, Eternity (p. 150). Aslan then summons the creatures of the Narnian world—those who have been dead, like Roonwit the Centaur, Jewel the Unicorn, the boar, the bear, and the horses (p. 154), and those who have not died: some were living in distant parts of Narnia or in foreign countries, while others were at Stable Hill [ß p. 124] but “just crept quietly away during the fighting” (p. 120). The door now symbolizes the entrance to paradise, the way of acceptance. Aslan stands at the doorway, on its left side, as the creatures approach him:

 

As they came right up to Aslan one or other of two things happened to each of them. They all looked straight in his face; I don’t think they had any choice about that. And when some looked, the expression of their faces changed terribly—it was fear and hatred: except that, on the faces of Talking Beasts, the fear and hatred lasted only for a fraction of a second. You could see that they suddenly ceased to be Talking Beasts. They were just ordinary animals. And all the creatures who looked at Aslan in that way swerved to their right, his left, and disappeared into his huge black shadow, which . . . streamed away to the left of the doorway. The children never saw them again. I don’t know what became of them. But the others looked in the face of Aslan and loved him, though some of them were very frightened at the same time. And all these came in at the Door, in on Aslan’s right. (pp. 153-54)5

 

Aslan had already called the stars home, leaving “spreading blackness, . . . emptiness” behind (p. 151). The image of darkness is reinforced by images of water and then ice. After dragons and lizards reduce Narnia to a desert, “a foaming wall of water” comes across it: “The sea was rising. . . . All now was level water from where they stood to where the water met the sky” (pp. 155-56). The dying sun then licked up the moon and was squeezed to death by Father Time, “and instantly there was total darkness” (p. 157). Finally comes the cold: “Everyone except Aslan jumped back from the ice-cold air which now blew through the Doorway. Its edges were already covered with icicles” (p. 157). The Last Battle, then, goes beyond an account of the decline of a nation or world (a story of autumn) to its dissolution, to a story of winter, the central image of Frye’s fourth phase.6 Lewis’s choice of ending was probably influenced by the Icelandic myths he loved greatly throughout [ß p. 125] his life. But the question of a specific source is not important: it was the “right” conclusion archetypally, the one needed to convey with fullest impact the end of things, the completion of the cycle of nature and of the history of Narnia.7

            The larger part of The Last Battle is a winter’s tale, an account of the final days of Narnian history presented through images of darkness, death, and dissolution. But the end of Narnian history is not the end of the story. As Tirian is thrown through the stable door, the imagery shifts abruptly: “It was not dark inside the Stable, as he had expected. He was in strong light” (p. 131). Indeed, he and Jill and Eustace and Peter, Edmund, Lucy, Aunt Polly, and the Professor, in whose company he finds himself, are not in the stable at all: “They stood on grass, the deep blue sky was overhead, and the air which blew gently on their faces was that of a day in early summer” (p. 136). The story of winter, of dissolution, has given way to a story of summer, of triumph, of entry into paradise, and of the ideal, wish-fulfillment dream of romance.

            The sense of longing which was created intermittently in the earlier part of the story now intensifies greatly. The place Tirian has entered is a country of youth: as Jill puts it, the Professor and Aunt Polly aren’t “much older than we are here” (p. 139). It is a place of health—Edmund’s knee ceases to be sore and the Professor suddenly feels unstiffened; and abundance—they have crowns on their heads and are in glittering clothes; and freedom—“I’ve a feeling we’ve got to the country where everything is allowed” (p. 137). And it is a place of beauty and of bounty: “Not far away from them rose a grove of trees, thickly leaved, but under every leaf there peeped out the gold or faint yellow or purple or glowing red of fruits such as no one has seen in our world,” fruits compared with which “the freshest grapefruit you’ve ever eaten was dull, and the juiciest orange was dry, and the most melting pear was [ß p. 126] hard and woody, and the sweetest wild strawberry was sour.” After doing his best to say what it was like, the narrator confesses his inadequacy: “But I can’t describe it. You can’t find out what it is like unless you can get to that country and taste for yourself” (pp. 136-37).

            Most of all, it is a place where those who love and long for Aslan find fulfillment. Soon after entering Narnia, Tirian sees a brightness and turns around: “There stood his heart’s desire, huge and real, the golden Lion, Aslan himself” (p. 146). Here is the real object of all the unsatisfied and unsatisfiable longings experienced on earth: “If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanations is that I was made for another world. . . . I must [therefore] keep alive in myself the desire for my true country, which I shall not find till after death” (Mere Christianity, p. 120). Jewel’s words echo those sentiments closely: “I have come home at last! This is my real country! I belong here. This is the land I have been looking for all my life, though I never knew it till now” (p. 171). It is also the land that Emeth, the Calormene officer, has been looking for all his life, though he didn’t know it untill now. Because of his great desire for God and goodness, for wisdom and understanding, which he thought were embodied in Tash, harsh and cruel though he might seem to others, he is admitted to the new Narnia. In desiring and doing good, he was actually serving Aslan, not Tash, and the God of truth and love accepts his service as unto himself.8 Emeth believes, and he can see: “As soon as I had gone through the door, the first wonder was that I found myself in this great sunlight” (p. 163). The Dwarfs, on the other hand, do not believe and cannot see. They find only a small dark stable on the other side of the door. “How in the name of all Humbug can I see what ain’t there? And how can I see you any more than you can see me in this pitch darkness?” (p. 144). Even Aslan can do little for them: the rich feast [ß p. 127] he provides tastes to them like stable litter. “They will not let us help them. They have chosen cunning instead of belief. Their prison is only in their own minds, yet they are in that prison” (p. 148). And presumably they are in it still. Dante, in The Divine Comedy, left those who were unwilling to commit themselves to goodness or evil outside heaven and hell—neither place would accept them. Perhaps it is similar in the Narnian situation. The Dwarfs, after all, are for the Dwarfs: they fire arrows at talking horses and at Calormenes. Thus they neither disappear into Aslan’s shadow nor enter the new Narnia. Because Aslan was not their heart’s desire, because they did not long for his country, they apparently remain forever in that “pitch-black, poky, smelly little hole of a stable” (p. 144).

            The others, who have longed for Narnia as well as for Aslan, discover that they have both. Farsight the Eagle sums it up for the others: “We have all been blind. We are only beginning to see where we are. From up there I have seen it all—Ettinsmuir, Beaversdam, the Great River, and Cair Paravel still shining on the edge of the Eastern Sea. Narnia is not dead. This is Narnia” (p. 169). As he has tried to convey ideas about Christianity through the images of Narnia, so Lewis now tries to put Plato’s theory of ideas into images. First the Professor explains that the Narnia to which the Pevensie children could not return was not the real Narnia: “That had a beginning and an end. It was only a shadow or a copy of the real Narnia, which has always been here and always will be here. . . . And of course it is different; as different as a real thing is from a shadow or as waking life is from a dream” (pp. 169-70). Such idealistic philosophy is, of course, difficult to get across successfully, and Lewis tries to clarify it by an analogy:

 

Perhaps you will get some idea of it, if you think like this. [ß p. 128] You may have been in a room in which there was a window that looked out on a lovely bay of the sea or a garden valley that wound away among mountains. And in the wall of that room opposite to the window there may have been a looking glass. And as you turned away from the window you suddenly caught sight of that sea or that valley, all over again, in the looking glass. And the sea in the mirror, or the valley in the mirror, were in a sense just the same as the real ones: yet at the same time they were somehow different—deeper, more wonderful, more like places in a story: in a story you have never heard but very much want to know. (p. 170)  

 

Lewis’s comparison captures, by the distancing effect of a mirror’s reflection, a sense of wonder and inaccessibility and it reinforces his point that the “reality” of the physical world out the window is not the ultimate reality. Heaven is, as Lucy says, something new and different and yet familiar: “This is still Narnia, and, more real and more beautiful than the Narnia down below” (p. 180). Once more Lewis holds the prospect out before the reader enticingly: “I can’t describe it any better than that: if you ever get there, you will know what I mean” (p. 171).

            The theme of longing is particularly strong at the end of the book. It grows out of the image of summer, for one thing, with its emphasis on youth (“This was his father young and merry as he could just remember him from very early days”—p. 177), and brightness (“The light ahead was growing stronger”—p. 182), and beauty (“There were forests and green slopes and sweet orchards and flashing waterfalls, one above the other, going up for ever”—p. 182). And it grows out of Lewis’s usual images for longing, mountains and sensory appeals, not this time music but sweet smells: “So all of them passed in through the golden gates, into the delicious smell that blew towards them out of that garden and into the cool mixture of sunlight and shadow under the tress, walking on springy turf that was all dotted with white flowers” (p. 178). For the characters in the book, it is no longer an unsatisfied longing: they [ß p. 129] have reached their true country and will not be sent away to our world again. They are united with him they have longed for, seen now in human form: “And as He spoke He no longer looked to them like a lion” (p. 183).9 And then things began to happen “that were so great and beautiful that I cannot write them” (pp. 183-84). Digory felt sure at the end of The Magician’s Nephew that “they were all going to live happily ever after.” But his expectation was premature: that was only the beginning of the story and much unhappiness was still to come. Now the real end of their story has arrived “and we can most truly say that they all lived happily ever after” (p. 184).

            For the reader, however, the sense of longing is not satisfied but increased, by the descriptions of the new Narnia, by the review of characters from the previous books, and by the knowledge that “for us this is the end of all the stories” (p. 184). Perhaps the chief glory of the Chronicles is that the stories themselves create in many readers longings which cannot be satisfied in this world and then point readers toward the greater story in which such longings will be satisfied at last: “Now . . . they were beginning Chapter One of the Great Story, which no one on earth has read: which goes on for ever: in which every chapter is better than the one before” (p. 184). [ß p. 130]